fly fishing gear
Return to all Gear Articles

Suggestion Box: Stickers, Grips and Fly Rod Re-Issues

by Robert Morselli

What follows are a few not-so-random ideas that come from testing lots and lots of product.

Plasticized Line ID Stickers

Fly Line Stickers

Kindly refer to photo. The spool pictured is wound with RIO’s #8 Permit taper. If you’re chasing them, this is the line that I recommend, because it’s weighted and balanced better than any other I’ve tested in recent memory.

I know that it’s a #8, and that it’s a Permit taper, and that it’s made by RIO – only because I wound it on two weeks ago – but you wouldn’t know it from the line ID sticker that RIO, as all other fly line manufacturers, supplied with the packaging.

The line has been fished a total of three times.

Those of us with spool collections – modest or large – greatly depend on these stickers, which are all printed on a paper base, and the result is all too often the one you see pictured.

Note to RIO, Orvis, Scientific Anglers, Cortland, Airflo and others: plasticized line ID stickers, please.

Bigger Rod Grips

St. Croix Fly Rod Grip

Kindly refer to photo. That’s a St. Croix fly rod.  Model: Avid (circa 2005).

It’s an 8-weight, it’s also my favourite saltwater rod. I remember it being reasonably priced, at somewhere around the $350 mark.

I have two other salt-water fly rods. Both are 2014 models that cost two-and-a-half times what was paid for the old Avid – they’re both excellent fly rods as well.

I use the Avid far more than the newer, and in several ways, better rods (perfectly understandable considering the materials and process advances made over the last decade).

Recently, I wondered what it is that keeps me hooked to that old Avid? The answer is the cork grip, which is larger – but only by a few millimetres – than any other rod that I use. Overall, the rod is more comfortable to fish, and the kicker is that I cast better (although not necessarily farther) with it. I suspect that the rod was designed and built with a template that no longer exists. Hopefully, I’m wrong.

I’ll stop short of the absurd statement that I wish all my rods had that same grip, which just wouldn’t make sense on a 2 or 3 or 4-weight (…), but will state that my lighter line rods would probably benefit – me – if they had marginally larger diameter grips.

My hands might be wee larger than average (I’m 6’1” – certainly no giant), but I’m sure that they aren’t “off-the-chart” large.

On a hunch, I tried an experiment: I wrapped the grips of two of my smaller fly rods (3 and 4-weight) with bicycle handlebar tape, and the results were impressive. Increased comfort, easier and better, more controlled casting.

I’m aware that grip size and configuration make up a large part of any rod’s architecture, but still wonder if it’s possible that cork grip diameters have been a little undersized all this time.

Also, would it be at all possible to offer the same blank with different grip sizing?

Fly Rod Re-Issues

GVX Fly Rod

That’s an RL Winston GVX Select – good luck finding one

I fondly remember my very first fly rod, a 2-section, 8’6” 5-weight St. Croix Imperial (1998 edition). It was a great rod, but I gave it away – only because the rod tube length became an issue at airports. Everything I own today breaks down to 4 sections. Still, if I could repurchase that original, 2-section fly rod today, I would: for nostalgic reasons, and for local fishing situations…

Over the years, I’ve heard on far too many occasions from anglers who wished their (generally) older rods could be repaired rather than replaced with new model rods. It’s not that we don’t care for new products or developments, it’s just that, sometimes, older wares suit us just fine: sort of like “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” These are implements we are used to using, we know them and, dare I say, love them.

But fly rods break.

Not to pick on St. Croix (apologies to the Schluter brothers!), but I had a favorite fly rod: a 4-weight, 4-section, older generation AVID (blank color was flat grey). Of the many fly rods I had at the time, that 4-weight was the one that got the most mileage. By far. After 8 years of fishing, I bone-headedly attempted to carry that (fully assembled) AVID through a spring-loaded screen door. The door won, and I was out one favorite rod. I tested new model AVIDs (blank color: canteen green), and they are great rods – I’ll even happily concede that they’re better than older model AVIDS in several respects, but still…

Ditto RL Winston GVX Select.

Ditto Sage SLT.

Ditto a few others I could easily add to this list but won’t as I’m certain you get the message.

Reel companies do it (Ross G-Series, Orvis CFO, anyone?), so why not fly rod companies? Think about it: all the R&D is done, the blank formulas already exist, so why not add one or two of your best-regarded fly rods to the current catalog? You’d be making many, many anglers happy. Scratch that— very happy.

MidCurrent Fly Fishing
 
Robert Morselli is the research director for the internationally syndicated television show "How It's Made."
Bookmark the permalink.
  • Walker Percy

    regarding the larger grips……..that’s a tough one. I’ve progressed over the years from larger to smaller grips. I find they provide more control and less fatigue. My buddy went the opposite direction for the same reasons!
    You could always go custom……a good custom builder can replicate the grip on that St Croix.

    • doubledok

      I wrote a few “scholarly” articles in FFF “The LOOP” regarding benefits of larger circumference grips (NOT diameter) in addressing adaptation to injuries while fly casting. Perhaps you would find them helpful in altering existing grips to function better. Dr. G. Eaton

  • Tom Hazelton

    Re: the line ID stickers … Scientific Anglers, at least, prints the taper and weight right on the tip of the line itself. Better than a sticker, especially if you ever swap the line from spool to spool.

    • 3weight

      Thanks Tom – was aware of that – but I want those stickers as well

  • zachmatthews

    May as well join the party. Re: the rod re-issues.

    I’ve discussed this with manufacturers. The problem is that even if the original mandrels remain available, the carbon fiber pre-preg does not. It’s not widely understood but rods actually change even within their own life cycles, especially with long-running rod series like the Scott G or G2. Over a decade, original designs sometimes need to be tweaked in order to account for changes in available materials (usually these have a greater strength to weight ratio, so if you just roll the same amount on there that you used to, you may wind up with a radically stiffer or faster rod section than you want).

    Old rods like the Sage XP get mentioned all the time, but if Sage were to roll up an XP with modern materials, all of the technique advances and equipment changes they have gone through since 1999 would also need to be rolled back, and I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the machines themselves no longer exist.

    Bottom line is that fly rods are *perishables* that can only really be made for a certain amount of time. Then the industry moves on. A copy an old design would be possible, but it wouldn’t actually be that old rod you remember so fondly.

  • Pingback: CORK ROD HANDLE DESIGN – SHAPE AND CIRCUMFERENCE IS IMPORTANT | Active Angling New Zealand()

  • David Straub

    I keep a journal that has all my rods and reels and lines in it, which shows what line is on any reel or spool at any given time – the trick is to remember to update my journal when I change out a line. Also, some of the lines have their data imprinted on them – which is a nice touch. I wonder how durable the plastic is with those label makers?