Serve (Or At Least Ship) My Fish Frozen

Salmon in a market, Seattle, USA

Image via Wikipedia

An interesting perspective from Astrid Scholz, Ulf Sonesson and Peter Tydmers in The New York Times notes that if you’re serious about reducing the environmental impact of fish consumption, you should buy flash-frozen rather than fresh salmon (unless, of course, your fish come from the local river). The reason: “Most salmon consumers live far from where the fish was caught or farmed, and the majority of salmon fillets they buy are fresh and shipped by air, which is the world’s most carbon-intensive form of travel.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
This entry was posted in Conservation. Bookmark the permalink.
  • jdubya

    Yeah, but they also said farmed salmon has the same environmental impact as harvesting wild. That is a crock so why believe anything they say?