fly fishing conservation
Return to all Conservation Articles

How Many Menhaden Do We Really Need?

by Beau Beasley

MenhadenThe Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC), a consortium of 15 states from Maine to Florida, manages the fisheries for part of the Chesapeake Bay and for waters 3 to 200 miles off the East Coast. Created in 1942, the ASMFC is essentially the most important watchdog for—and sets and restricts the harvest levels of—a variety of fish, including the lowly menhaden, a small, oily baitfish that lies near the bottom of the food chain. Today the harvest levels of the humble menhaden are the focus of much scrutiny and debate.

Just about everything consumes menhaden, including stripers, flounder, tuna, crabs, and even pelicans. Menhaden are a major source of nutrition for a whole host of sea creatures in the Chesapeake Bay (and up and down the entire Eastern Seaboard). Because they are such a crucial link in the food chain, many view menhaden as a bellwether species, the health of which provides insight into the overall health of the Chesapeake Bay. And that is why stakeholders greeted the news that the ASMFC’s latest stock assessment put menhaden spawning potential at just 8 percent of an unfished stock—a historically low level—with such despair.

Texas-based Omega Protein, the largest commercial harvester of menhaden in North America, has a processing plant in Reedville, Virginia. The company harvests about 240 million pounds of menhaden annually from the Chesapeake Bay using spotter planes and ships. These commercial vessels can nets as many as 50,000 menhaden at a time. The fish are then processed into a host of products including heart-healthy supplements, feed for dogs and swine, and ironically, commercial fish food.

Omega Protein’s large menhaden harvests have drawn sharp criticism from recreational anglers and conservation groups alike. Ben Landry, spokesman for Omega Protein, argues that the company is acting responsibly: “The menhaden fishery has been operating for over 130 years. Omega Protein’s fishing effort is considered lower than it has been for generations, since we are operating a mere nine vessels. So there is less fishing pressure on the stock and the fishing is now condensed to the mid-Atlantic region.”

Incidentally, Omega Protein is not the only commercial angler putting pressure on the menhaden fishery. Bait boats also gather menhaden for lobster traps and tackle shops and account for nearly 20 percent of all menhaden harvested. Because baitfish stocks in general appear to be in decline, tempers are flaring in New Jersey, where no limits have been imposed on harvesting menhaden as bait. Commercial bait fisherman from New England, unable to fish for river herring because of a moratorium put in place by the ASMFC, have seasonally shifted operations to New Jersey, where 30 million pounds of menhaden were harvested by bait anglers last year alone.

River herring, a close cousin to menhaden, have already been brought to the brink of extinction as a result of dam construction, water pollution, and commercial overfishing. Peter Baker, director of the Herring Alliance and the Pew Environmental Groups Northeast Program, a conservation group based in New England, sees a connection between river herring and menhaden. “River herring populations along the Atlantic coast have collapsed, which makes preserving sustainable levels of menhaden extremely important. The ASMFC can’t sit idly by and let this fishery collapse as well.”

Conservation groups like the Herring Alliance and the Chesapeake Bay Foundation along with many recreational anglers have recommended that the ASMFC adopt a position called “Option 2,” which suggests raising the maximum spawning potential of menhaden to 15 percent. The argument from the pro-Option 2 crowd is that if more menhaden are left in the Chesapeake Bay to reproduce in the first place, then they should produce more menhaden. If adopted, this option might require significant reductions in menhaden harvest levels, much to the chagrin of commercial harvesters.

Each state sends three commissioners to the ASMFC, though the commissioners cast just one vote. And they’ll be exercising that single vote on behalf of the menhaden fishery very shortly now: The ASMFC will hold a final public hearing in Boston on November 2. Anglers who wish to weigh in on the issue may contact their respective commissioners here.

Menhaden Stats

MidCurrent Fly Fishing
 
Beau Beasley (www.beaubeasley.com) is an award-winning journalist and investigative conservation writer. His even-handed approach and through research on saltwater forage fish have garnered him respect with conservationist and commercial anglers alike. The author of Fly Fishing Virginia and Fly Fishing the Mid-Atlantic, he also serves as the Director of Programs and Sponsorship Development for the Virginia Fly Fishing Festival (www.vaflyfishingfestival.org)  Beau lives with this wife and children in Warrenton VA.
This article is filed under Conservation with sub-topics , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • DaveP

    I live in Brewster MA on Cape Cod and we used to have one of the most prolific runs in the area.   Water quality and poor return rates have all but decimated this historic run.   Most years I would visit the run in mid to late September and see thousands of small herring returning to the sea.  They would then school on the Brewster Flats and the birds would be active for a month.  This year, the ponds were choked with algae blooms, the run was quiet and only a few baby herring have dropped back this fall.  No birds in the usual grass spots feeding on the schools of herring.   This is a sad situation on Cape Cod.

  • Pingback: Menhaden: an 86% decline - The North American Fly Fishing Forum

  • paulyfish

    For more info about the plight of the Menhaden and to submit comments to asmfc online please visit menhaden defenders online.
    All Rec Fisherman have got to UNITE and stick together on this one!
    Tight lines,
    Paulyfish

  • Jerryjjar

    It’s an interesting question: how many menhaden do we really need? Here in western long island sound, water quality has been improving along with sewage treatment plant upgrades. Even though we have had no adult bunker all summer, I have been watching this Fall as local protected brackish estuaries have been supporting schools of peanuts. We have the estuaries and the algae to sustain quite large bunker populations-as large as were once common in this region. It would be fascinating to see those menhaden numbers return and observe the impact upon predator populations and water quality.

  • Pingback: Bass, Menhaden, Everything | Fishing Jones

  • Pingback: Bunker. | Fly & Gin

  • Saearle

    If the ocean could speak, the message would be for humans to stop killing menhaden.  Period.

    They are critical both as a source of food for numerous birds, fish, marine mammals and other sea life –and as a natural filtration system vital for maintaining water quality.  Menhaden strain plankton-rich water for sustenance, accessing food that larger animals are not able to utilize.  But they certainly can — and do– eat menhaden!

    It does not make sense to grind up Menhaden to feed to farm animals that normally eat plants. 

    It does make sense to give these valuable little fish a break.

    Full protection is vital if we are serious about restoring and protecting the health of the coastal waters from New England to the Gulf where these small but mighty fish normally range.